by Mojojo » Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:06 pm
Its a bit of a conundrum really.
A simple lifestyle where I don't have to buy much of anything is waht I want as well, where I earn my 'living' working on the land.
But then if you look at it closely, the very basic things I need to live that life, need the massive international industries that produce them.
While modern materialism/consumerism is definitely changing this planet beyond repair, in a pure sense its very very difficult to live entirely simply. The Amish do pretty god job of it. But even they have to make some allowances, eg axe heads and saws that are made from Iron ore mined in Australia, shipped to China, processed in a large factory, then shipped to America by another huge company, for example.
First you need land to live on and from. How much land? (as an aside, I did some calculations a while back that showed there is approximately 1.24 acres of arable land available in the world per person, and other - more detailed and by more qualified people - studies show the similar figures. Is this enough land?)
All well and good if you have inherited some land. But for most of us, it means we have to purchase it.
Which means we have to either have an income to secure a mortgage, be able to obtain an income from the land to pay for the mortgage, or have put away enough money from working for a portion of our lives to buy the land outright.
For the most part we need a job, at least for part of our lives, to do this. Most jobs are in someway connected to the massive materialistic/consumerist lifestyle! Not to mention how we travel to those jobs, or how we manage the money we earn from those jobs. Banking, retail, the oil and gas industry, mining in my case, are all involved. I am really struggling to think of one job that is not at least partly related to or dependant on the very thing we are trying to avoid here.
So I have a car. Having a car goes totally against the principle of living simply, if you think of all of the materials that went into making the car, and all of the things that are required to run a car... Petrol, oils, petrochemicals used to make tryes and rubber from plantations that are destroying natural forest and animal habitat in asia.
Although I love the romatic idea of driving a horse and cart to the nearest town for whatever supplies I need, in reality, this is not going to happen. Because of the massive centralisation and ease of transport, I couldn't actually get the things I needed in the local town, for example, fabric to make clothing. I would have to travel some 45 kms away, which is a very long way by horse!
Thats just the very tip of the iceberg... think of your computer, the internet, power... even if it is solar power the materials that are needed to produce the panels have massive industry behind them.
OK, the above points are looking at the simple life principle from an extremely pessimistic view, definitely. And I know that the point is to minimise this impact. Indeed its a very big part of what I want to do with the rest of my life. I've also been thinking about it a bit because we need approximately a five year transition period to get our property to a point where it is paying for itself, and indeed, we need people to buy our produce for it to do that at all.
Every little thing we have or use has been built by someone, somewhere, contributing to the problem. Even very simple living has an impact. Yes, we just need to minimise this impact, but it is nigh on impossible to eliminate it.
Mind you, I do tend to get caught up with the problem within the problem within the problem, and lose sight of the objective.
Last edited by
Mojojo on Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
~ Jo
---------------------------------------------------------------
The only person responsible for your happiness is you
---------------------------------------------------------------